Skip to main content

Seer stone in a hat - Book of Mormon translation

From the Mormon.org page on The Book of Mormon, we read, "By the power of God, Joseph Smith translated this book from an ancient record written on gold plates. In September 1827, Joseph received the record, which was written on thin plates of gold. Joseph translated the book into English by the inspiration of God and called the book the Book of Mormon."

Inspiration is defined for us on the same page as "divine guidance that comes through the promptings of the Holy Ghost." Let's look a little closer at that process of translation. From the LDS Newsroom article on the Book of Mormon we read, "Joseph translated the plates in about three months after which he returned them to the angel Moroni. " That's 531 pages in 85 days!

The process of translating evolved

President Faust said, "The process of translating the Book of Mormon was an education for Joseph Smith. When the Lord called him, he was a young man, unlearned, simple, and very ordinary in the eyes of the world. The translation process taught the unlearned young man from New York essential lessons which were vital for his call as the prophet of the Restoration."

In the Doctrine and Covenants (D&C 5:4) the Lord said to Joseph, "And you have a gift to translate the plates." The Lord also said in D&C 20:8 that He "gave him power from on high, by the means which were before prepared, to translate the Book of Mormon." So literally, the Lord said that the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, just as we claim.

“These were days never to be forgotten—to sit under the sound of a voice dictated by the inspiration of heaven, awakened the utmost gratitude of this bosom! Day after day I continued, uninterrupted, to write from his mouth, as he translated with the Urim and Thummim, or, as the Nephites would have said, ‘Interpreters,’ the history or record called ‘The Book of Mormon.’"

Oliver Cowdery, Messenger and Advocate, Oct. 1834, 14, or Joseph Smith—History 1:71, note

How the seer stones were used

Moroni said to Joseph, "that there were two stones in silver bows—and these stones, fastened to a breastplate, constituted what is called the Urim and Thummim—deposited with the plates; and the possession and use of these stones were what constituted “seers” in ancient or former times; and that God had prepared them for the purpose of translating the book.

“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English.

"Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man.”

Source: David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, Richmond, Mo.: n.p., 1887, p. 12.

We do not know all the details

I think the process David Whitmer was describing above may have been true for only the early work when Joseph was first learning to translate. The Lord referred to the process of using the seer stones in translation as having "sight and power." We know that Joseph did not need or use the seer stones in translating the later portion of the work but we do not know all the details.

Elder Orson Pratt of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles said Joseph Smith told him that he used the Urim and Thummim when he was inexperienced at translation but that later he did not need it, which was the case in Joseph’s translation of many verses of the Bible (Millennial Star, 11 Aug. 1874, 498–99 as quoted by Elder Maxwell).

We do not know all the details of the translation process or how much Joseph used or needed the seer stones. The Lord made it clear that it was a powerful and merciful gift: "And after having received the record of the Nephites, yea, even my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., might have power to translate through the mercy of God, by the power of God, the Book of Mormon (D&C 1:29).

Judge the results, not the method used

The Lord told the three witnesses that He was pleased with the Book of Mormon as translated by Joseph Smith: "...he has translated the book, even that part which I have commanded him, and as your Lord and your God liveth it is true."

The Three Witnesses testified: "And we also know that they have been translated by the gift and power of God, for his voice hath declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety that the work is true." They saw the plates as shown unto them by a angel.

Joseph Smith declared that “the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, . . . and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than any other book” (History of the Church, 4:461). I add my testimony to the witness of Joseph.

The Book of Mormon is a test

I am confident that there are many who are investigating the Church who turn to Internet sites to get an understanding of what the Book of Mormon is all about. When they read or hear about the use of seer stones for the first time (in a hat), it can seem strange and very different.

Even Hyrum, the brother of the Prophet was told by Joseph Smith that “it was not intended to tell the world all the particulars of the coming forth of the Book of Mormon” and that “it was not expedient for him to relate these things” (History of the Church, 1:220).

Don't get hung up on the use of a "seer stone in a hat" that may have been used in the early days of translating the Book of Mormon. The method of how it was translated is not a big deal. The real test of the authenticity of the book is found in Moroni's promise. Ask God in prayer.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I don't care about seer stone or whatever.
I am not an english native speaker and I had to learn your language first at shool, then on my mission, and then I "polished" it at university when I majored in English. I can make mistake still but I know how to correct them and if I take the time to think about things I can tell why this or that should be said.

I took this class with one of the most proeminent scholar, since she is a famous translator, who would seldomly give a grade above 8/20. I got 12.5!!!!

Why am I bragging about it?

Because I know (I don't have faith or trust or whatever) that translating such a book would take forever to this teacher, probably a lifetime, therefore it is absolutely impossible for someone lacking her knowledge (such as J.Smith) to do it. I know the field of translation, I know what it takes, I know what it took me to get a mere 12.5 with this teacher, I know I am far more educated than he was, therefore I can't imagine any other way to translate this book but by a higher power.
I can also see how the Lord educated him by enabling him to translate this book.
Max said…
You are mixing two completely different objects and making them become one.
I don't know if this is the intention or not.

The U & T was found with the Plates given to Joseph Smith.

There was also a seer stone found in a well.

The U & T is what Joseph Smith taught (and Oliver Cowdery) was used to Translated the Book of Mormon.

David Whitmer argues that the Seer stone was used.

These are two different items, and is still debated how much the seer stone was actually used in translation. Mostly because why use the seer stone if the U & T was still around?
Tim Malone said…
Sorry Max, that was not my intention to leave the impression that the seer stone and the Urim and Thummim were one and the same. They are not. And I agree with you that the amount of usage of the seer stone in translating the Book or Mormon is still not clear. You statements are concise and provide ample summary of the two methods used. I might also point out that at times, Joseph used neither instrument in bringing forth the translation of an ancient document, as in the book of Moses. Your clarifying comments are greatly appreciated.
evangelical said…
Dear Tim, it seems you are not willing to take seriously my scriptural case, elsewhere, against the LDS understanding of the priesthood and Mormon exclusivism. This is unfortunate. But, for now, I think we'll move on to a different issue. Namely, that of the seer stone in the hat.

This is a very important issue, it seems to me, for the central book of Mormonism was translated, so it is said, through the seer stone in the hat. To be more precise, a significant portion of the Book of Mormon was translated through the seer stone and/or urim and thumim.

That this alleged process may seem odd at first blush does give us cause to re-examine such a fundamental event. Perhaps if it is weird then it is false? But I do not think it is the right question to ask. A talking donkey is weird because it had never happened before, or since, but it really did happen (I believe and you do too, I think).

The correct question to ask, then, is, is it true? Do we have any reason to believe it? Presumably, your answer to this question would be, "we know that it is true for Joseph told us." And how do we know we can believe Joseph?

Because you feel that he is telling the truth? I did not ask why we should feel that he is telling the truth but how we can know it. Is there a reasonable doubt?

Yes, and for at least two reasons. First, there is the matter of the missing pages which allegedly translated "the more secular part". The scribe took it home and his wife apparently destroyed it. Then God very conveniently revealed that Joseph did not have to retranslate that part. The temptation is very strong to suppose Joseph was just making the whole thing up as he went along (if the retranslation did not match the original which, for all he knew, his scribe's wife still had, it would be devastating to his claims and why would God have him translate it in the first place if it would end up being lost).

Secondly, it is apparently admitted even by Mormon historians, in good standing, that the Smith family, including Joseph hiself, practiced magic. "Rough Stone Rolling" gives an account of this, if memory serves. And what is one of the most common magical practices of all time? Crystal gazing. The difference between divination through a crystal (ball) and receiving information through looking into a rock does not seem very large to me. And the Bible condemns witchcraft just as clearly as it condemns polytheism.

Ultimately, like everything else in Mormonism, we are reduced to subjectivity/feeling and the claims of one man, Joseph Smith, who is commonly viewed outside of Mormon circles as less than totally honest. And we have good objective evidence (two pieces of evidence were laid out above) for supposing he lied about this.

But I need to qualify that. I am not calling into question that Smith put a rock in his hat and claimed it enabled him to see an English translation of Reformed Egyptian. What I am questioning is that it really enabled him to so do.

As you know, we do not have access to the gold plates so Egyptologists cannot compare the translation. What they can compare, and have, is the Book of Abraham scroll. At the very least, their findings on that score-which you have blown off while safely sheltered in your bubble of personal testimony-should raise the possibilty that maybe, just maybe, the Book of Mormon is not all it is cracked up to be. Maybe Smith really was lying about the seer stone in the hat. Your thoughts on this?
Unknown said…
Of the accounts outlining the BoM translation with any specificity, nearly all talk of the seer stone in the hat method. (This is same method that Joseph used to see buried treasure in his money digging days.) Grant Palmer claims that at least 20 witnesses talk of this method and not the U&T.

Among these are David Whitmer, Emma and Martin Harris.
Personally I think there is a question mark as to whether JS even had the U&T after 116 page debacle.

Popular Posts

Facebook Discussion Group for Latter-day Commentary

At the request of my bishop, I have created a new space for those who wish to discuss posts from this blog on a closed Facebook group rather than in the comments below. You can find it at this link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/latterdaycommentary/ I hesitated a long time before creating this group. I feel strongly such a move should not have been necessary. If you are LDS and are even halfway awake you should be interested in learning more about the mysteries of the kingdom and discussing them. But apparently the "tone" of my posts has upset too many people. Best Vacation I've Ever Enjoyed I just returned from two Denver Snuffer lectures in Las Vegas and St. George, then spent three days at the Salt Lake 2014 Sunstone Symposium. This was absolutely the best vacation I have ever enjoyed. I can't remember the last time I was able to take two weeks off without having to put out some sort of IT fire at work every night from the hotel via Remote Desktop. Some people l

Do This in Remembrance of Me

  On that fateful Passover night in the Meridian of Time before Gethsemane , the Savior instituted the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper. The Sacrament was a change from the way His disciples were used to observing the Passover. Therefore, the Messiah gave them a commandment to do the things which they had seen him do, that is, break bread and partake of wine “unto the end.” In the Book of Mormon, the Lord gave  another commandment to his disciples, “that ye shall not suffer any one knowingly to partake of my flesh and blood unworthily … if ye know that a man is unworthy … ye shall forbid him.” Thus, in our modern Church Handbook of Instructions, we find the same injunction. You also find there the restriction of the sacrament as a punishment. I would like to investigate the idea of restricting a man from partaking of the sacrament as an appropriate inducement to change his way of thinking. Frankly, I disagree with this idea, and have taken many opportunities to counsel bishops with whom

Cry Mightily Unto the Lord

The Brother of Jared took sixteen small stones to the mountain . We know they were small because he carried them in his hands. They were certainly smaller than an egg. Perhaps he had eight in each hand. When he came down from the mountain he had eighteen stones. The Lord gave him two more to be used by future prophets to read and translate the words the Brother of Jared would write of the Savior. After the Brother of Jared cried unto the Lord in a prayer of great faith and sound reasoning, the Lord touched the stones one by one with his finger. The record does not say the Brother of Jared placed the stones on a rock in front of him as we see depicted in the painting by Arnold Friberg. I like to think he held them in his hand as he cried unto the Lord in mighty prayer saying, “Lord, see these stones…” Assuming he held the stones in his hands, I wonder what that would have felt like as the Lord stretched forth his hand and touched them one by one. The Brother of Jared would have felt the

What to Expect When You’re Excommunicated

If you’re drawn to this blog post by the title, I ask you to look past that to the subtitle. It is “The Believing Mormon’s Guide to the Coming Purge.” Although this will be a review of Rock’s book , I hope it will also provide background and detail on why long-time members of the LDS Church would be willing to lay it all on the line in defending an idea that many find shocking. The idea is this: The LDS Church is in a state of apostasy and has been since before the death of Joseph Smith. The first time I posted about Denver Snuffer , I invited dialog on his teachings. I certainly did receive it – from both sides. One comment in particular stuck with me. I have been pondering it for years, wondering if it represented an accurate summary of Denver’s message. This is the comment: “Snuffer’s position can be summed up as follows: I was personally visited by Christ who made my calling and election sure, told me I was part of the true church within the dead church, that he would soon call oth

Concluding Testimony at my Disciplinary Council

I shared my testimony in our regular monthly testimony meeting this morning. I wanted to make sure the Bishop and a member of the Stake Presidency present - he’s also in our ward – heard me say I sustain the general authorities and local authorities of the church. Of course these words were in addition to sharing comments reflecting my love of my Heavenly Father and my Savior. Covering All the Bases Carol asked me afterward if I did that to offset whoever it was that complained about my blog a few months ago. I assured her I was sincere, but yes, I wanted the whole ward to know of my feelings for those who lead this church. I continue to sustain them with my prayers and with my money. Yes, I know my tithing is used to pay their salary. It also helps pay my sister’s salary. Follow the Bishop’s Counsel As far as I know, I’m not under any priesthood leader’s watch list for an impending disciplinary council, but a few of my friends and fellow bloggers have been surprised, so I’m being care

A Mormon Reviews The Afterlife of Billy Fingers

Storytelling in a Non-Fiction Book The Afterlife of Billy Fingers by Annie Kagan is a wonderful book. I give it five stars. One of the Amazon reviewers said she read the 191 page book in 90 minutes. It took me about three hours. I had to stop often to wipe away the tears. The book was an emotional and spiritual roller-coaster. Thank you, Annie for that superb and captivating storytelling in a non-fiction book. Messages From the Spirit World The book extends three challenges to its readers: First, is it fiction or fact? Annie didn’t have to expend a great deal of effort and energy to persuade me it really happened. I was convinced right away by the down-to-earth, day-to-day events of Annie’s life as she dealt with the loss of her older brother Billy to a tragic accident. I have no doubt Billy came to her to share his transition. Traditional Heaven and Hell Missing Second, you will need to re-examine what you know about the after-life, especially if you have accepted traditional heaven

Cut Off From Among My people

When one is excommunicated from the LDS Church, he is provided instructions by the Bishop or Stake President as to what he can and cannot do. Given that the church just severed the relationship with the individual excommunicated you would think the instructions provided are no longer applicable. It is assumed they are given with the intention of helping the individual make their way back to baptism again within a short period of time, even as little as one year. Instructions Provided When Excommunicated It has been my sad duty over the years to write and deliver the notice to appear, then to write the summary of the disciplinary council for the report sent to Salt Lake, and the instructions given to the individual who has been the subject of church discipline. Frankly, I have found it a difficult process. It requires that I listen intently and take copious notes so as to capture the essence of what transpired, what was considered, what was decided and finally, what instruction was

The True Order of Prayer

I’m not sure if I can write the things I feel in my heart right now. I am simply overwhelmed with emotion. I’ve asked the Lord’s permission to share this and He said yes. It’s a sacred experience to me. I hope the spirit bears witness. I’ll give you a little bit of background first, share what the Lord allows me and conclude tomorrow with what He asked me to write on a different subject. A Forty-Year Search On Sunday, I culminated a forty-year search for understanding of The True Order of Prayer. Yes, I was seventeen when I first learned about this, even before I was endowed. You see, my parents were both incredibly active in Temple service. Mother ’s life work was to do her family history. I have her patriarchal blessing where it’s stated it was her calling and election. She made it sure. My Mother’s Calling and Election Before she died, mother published multiple books of family history, genealogy and research on some 25,000 ancestors. She and my father personally did most of the ordi

A Dialogue About the Devil

I spent way too much time on this dialogue about the devil to not share it publically. I know. It's a terrible subject to contemplate. Why are we discussing these ideas when there are so many other areas of light that would be more worthy of our time and attention? You can skip this if you want. We all have to be selective about where we spend our time and energy. I open it up for public discussion, or more likely, for public correction. See if you can spot and correct any false doctrine here. Hello Brother Malone, I have no scriptural reference for my thoughts I share with you regarding Lucifer but wondered if in your studies and readings you have heard this scenario before. We are taught Lucifer was esteemed as per the Savior in the pre-existence before his apparent fall. Is it possible he did not fall and that like the Savior he chose to accept the calling of being Satan as Jesus accepted the calling of being Savior, that the great council was more about a communal and loving di

Keys of the Kingdom Revisited

Carol and I have had a running conversation since Sunday about the succession crisis at the death of Joseph. To me, it has become the crux of the matter when considering the legitimacy of the LDS Church as the Kingdom of God on the earth. We have both been taught all our lives that Brigham had the Keys of the Kingdom and therefore nothing was lost when Joseph was killed. Before I present anything may I remind everyone that this is the blog of a private member of the LDS Church and in no way represents the official viewpoints or doctrines of the LDS Church. For that, go to  lds.org where you can read the official narrative of how the succession between Joseph and Brigham took place. I won’t review it here. I assume you are familiar with the story. Second point: if my writing about this bothers you, please don’t read it. I am simply trying to understand our history more perfectly. If the history of our Church is not something that has anything to do with your faith or your willingness t